third_party_content:community:commentary:forums_nonworks:0f10bf0354c6c414852566d4004d81ca

Sign up on the Revelation Software website to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from the Revelation community

At 08 DEC 1998 09:06:34AM KRaina wrote:

We need to prevent any user from updating any field except Status if status field is empty. We do not want to run processes from the windows, since we already have several runing from them.

Any suggestions?

KRaina


At 09 DEC 1998 02:34AM Larry Wilson - TARDIS Systems, Inc. wrote:

The answer is an MFS that is written minimally to use the smallest footprint, thus taking the least time to execute. A properly written one will do the job very quickly and quietly, and a hook on the

background process of INDEXING will make sure that no one removes it so that they can change the records (it checks to make sure the MFS is still in place.) No good having a security MFS without some kind of check. Of course, the best system will also hook a system routine (in real languages, it's called subclassing) so that the checking routine can't be removed. I'd be glad to knock one out for you and write an installation/deinstallation program. Payment only after you are satisified.

303-680-8555

Website[/b] We also have a NEW discussion group on Delphi which is a GREAT improvement over the FrontPage one; however, they make you register (free and only about 2 minutes, then on their 1st e-mail, add them to your spam screener ) The messages allow file attachments and embedded HTML without the 'secrets' of RTI. There's a link on my first page. </QUOTE> —- === At 09 DEC 1998 11:54AM Kraina wrote: === <QUOTE>Thanks, for the response. The problem is that the company might not be interested in paying for the solution.I'm not very familiar with MFS's, so have to think of alternate solution. </QUOTE> —- === At 14 DEC 1998 11:24AM [email protected] - Sprezzatura, Inc. wrote: === <QUOTE>You're only real options are an MFS or another window hook. I suppose you could prompt the user for the record key, read in the record, then depending on what status is, load up differing windows, one that allows a write and one that does not. [email protected] Sprezzatura, Inc. www.sprezzatura.com_zz.jpg </QUOTE> View this thread on the forum...

  • third_party_content/community/commentary/forums_nonworks/0f10bf0354c6c414852566d4004d81ca.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/12/28 07:40
  • by 127.0.0.1