Is there any source where a more or less complete survey of AREV tools, utiliteis or other language extensions is available?

If not veryone who offers tools, utilities or even complete modules to other AREV developers might give a short dexcription of their products.

a special tools/utility section on this web page would be very helpful.

Now lets see what AREV material is available.

A. Singer

Truth be told, all material is AREV material. AREV is is the primary building block for quarks. However, in true quanatum theory, even when it is the sole building block, you can sometimes find other composites.

Now, here is where is all starts to get complicated. When a quark is make up of solely AREV particles, it has certain bizarre properties not shared by the other types of quarks.

The AREV quark can change quark flavors, mostly through a process known as bonding. For instance, the beta decay of a neutron converts a down quark into an up quark. On the other hand, the AREV quark is ``colorblind'', i. e., it is insensitive to quark colors.

(A quark flavor is the property that distinguishes between types of quarks, there are six flavours: up, down, strange, charmed, top, bottom and AREV. A quark color is a threefold property possessed by quarks, a bit like electric charge, which is believed to be the cause of the strong force. Quark colors are red, green and blue while antiquarks are cyan, magenta and yellow. The colors are in order so, red and cyan oppose and so forth. )

The AREV quark is not left-right symmetric. In other words, the physical laws governing the AREV quark look different when seen in a mirror.

The AREV quark is not symmetric to the interchange of particles and antiparticles in certain situations. (This is the primary reason for the lack of ODBC connectivity).

As one would expect, the AREV quark changes when under observation, most specifically technical support staff.

I hope this stresses the importance of AREV materials and how the universe would not be where it is today without this important particle.

Perhaps you should try an email to [email protected] and ask that your utility request be handled in the AREV utilities column written by a certain emu….in the meantime, try the website of

Steve Smith - he's probably got something you could use, or try email him from his site.

Eric

If you collide an assembler particle at 20 TeV with a basic particle at 20 TeV, do you expect to get the AREV quark? No, of course not, AREV is not pure energy. It is, at best, "murky" energy. An acceleration of 40 TeV might create a volkswagon, but not an AREV quark. And that, my friends, is not a significant event, even in Hollywood.

If, however, as you are saying AREV is a more primary form of energy than quarks, we won't know in our lifetime, unless high-energy physics discovers new methods of discovery; something that hasn't really happened since before WWII. Perhaps we can suggest that they program the new CERN accelerator using OpenInsight, thereby increasing the synergistic effect, and thuswise increase the likelihood of such a momentus discovery.

This discussion gives Shroedinger's CATalogue statement a whole new meaning. You don't know which enantiomer of the program you have until you've observed it running.

Gary, why you naughty boy!

Quarks won't make us jump for joy.

Seek the physics of your grin

Quarks adopt a plus-two spin

If your AREV answers save

Schroedinger won't even wave

Mass or energy berates

RTPx oscillates

Quantum theories are just fine

Try debugging your design

Sub quark momentums declare

RTP5 just won't care

Do your loops a black hole solve

Or will they just GOTO-resolve?

Tell us all CASE will adjust

To some IFs in P-CODE dust

Particles accelerate

Till when AREV halts irate

Unlike \AA55\ larks

Phantom errors. Phantom Quarks?

Your assertions raise disdain

AREV quanta. Hell, again?

Quarks ain't quarks, yes, that part's right

Try to Open your Insight!

Actually, if I collide an assembler particle with an basic article I will get an ARev quark. If I collide a C++ particle with a basic particle then I'll get OI.

But ARev is pure engery. While is runs and while it exists, it's not the information stored on the hard disk that matters, but the engine and the opcodes running through it at any given point. And that, my friend, is pure energy.

Also, I've never known a Volkswagon to make it to 40 anythings.

Gary Gnuclear.

I've seen volkswagons get up to 40-something (going down hill), and when it happens, they go the opposite (normal) direction: from matter back to energy, and are then dissipated.

In this particular universe, such matter goes from higher states of "order" to lower-level states on a regular basis. In fact, in the past twenty years it has happened so frequently to them that one rarely sees them in a functioning state anymore. It is only after extraordinary care that they remain functional, but then you always see that the disintegration to a lower state of order still occurred but was transferred over to the "matter's" owner.

The reason Volkswagons seems to go in opposite directions was because the engine was in the boot and the trunk in the bonnet, or too put it another way, it's brains where in it's tochas.

Volkwagons as engery prove an interesting points, that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. After all, we all know that bugs never came new. You could only find used bugs. It's almost perpetual motion.

Gary Gnu

Well, there is entropy, but as I was saying before, when volkswagons remain in a higher state of order, the entropy still occurs, but on the owner and not the vehicle. In other words, entropy is transferrable, a phenomenon which was unknown or at least undocumented until automobile lovers with volkswagons came into existence.

Another interesting thing is that when a car-park (see I can do British-speak even though I'm a yank) fills past a certain point with volkswagons, it changes states. When the threshold is reached, the lot imperceptibly but most certainly closes and becomes a junk yard. No one tries to claim the vehicles and there is no formal transfer of title, it is as if they had always been junk and had always been there. This is the kind of phenomenon you might expect in a quantum shift, but not in reality as we know it. So again, the volkswagon causes us to reconsider the boundaries of reality.

I don't know about that. I used to have a 69 bug, canary yellow with a sunroof. A great car. We had a great time cruising around the Serengetti. Back in college we used to see how many giraffes we could fit inside. Once we tried to cram all the local reprsentatives of the Bronx Zoo. Everything was fine until Eddie Elephant got his truck wrapped around the gear shift.

Anyway, over the years, the sunroof developed a leak and the floor rusted out. As we'd drive down the road, rocks and things used to fly through the holes and smack at us. We kept replacing it, welding more steel on the floor, but it couldn't take it untill finally the whole floor just collapsed. Just before we finally scrapped it, a bunch of us got inside, grabbed underneath and ran through a parking lot (see, I can do yanking as well) playing Flintstones.

In this case, the VW was slowly falling into a state of decay, with a half-life of about 1 year.

As for the Bug graveyards, I think you're missing an important point. You're going under the rational, but misguided assumption, that the bugs were placed there by transient owners or a migratory sense. However, the actual truth is that in the ancient days, Celtic towns where built around VW graveyards. Most of the tribes worshiped the bugs, but there are a few testaments to Jettas, Golfs and Foxes floating about.

Not many people are aware of this, but outside Stonehenge, about 4 miles down the road, on the other side of Old Sarum is a small temple devoted to the Cabrio.

It's also a very popular theory around some parts that Godzilla evolved from the VW Thing.

Gary Gnu

What I meant about the VW graveyards was that the cars parked there were never intended to be junked. It was a rare occasion, even 20 years ago for a lot to even approach the VW threshold. It was totally incidental that so many VWs were parked there, but the quantum effects which crossed all known boundaries of time and space occurred simply because of the crossing of that threshold. Someone would park the final VW, and when the engine died (intentionally or not) the shift would occur. No one knows if that person got out of the car, or even "ever existed" once the shift occurred into that quantum reality. So what is actually happening then is that instead of branching into new quantum realities, participants in that one shifted over to another, not knowing that the shift occurred.

Although I suppose if you think about it, the shift might have only occurred to the perceiver's reality and not the participants. So the solipsist philosophers can now nod knowingly.

Of course the exact manifestation of the shift depended on whether it was a manual or pseudo-automatic, the later occurring more spontaneously.

They came with automatics? If so, the quantum shifts probably occurred when a truckload of VWs with more than 65% automatics left the factory. The shift being that suddenly the reality of the perceiver (this person being in the frame of reference that spans both realities, which by definition never occurs) is different, though participants will never participate in the shift, only the VWs. Since they are not conscious, no one will know there was a shift. Therefore the phenomenon and this discussion is only a theory in someone's mind.

Just a thought.

Automatic Bugs come from an alternative quantum universe, and one that we cannot perceive. We can perceive the qunatum universe that contains the automatic manuals, or clutchless shifting Bugs.

(For those of you unfamiliar with VW lore, the VW Beetle, for a number of years, came with a weird cross between an automatic and standard transmission. You needed to shift gears manually, but there was no clutch. Moving the gearshift handle enabled the clutch for you.)

However, because we can perceive these quantum realities, we must remain aware that our very perception is altering these realities. Thus, what we see, does not exist, at least in our reality. However, since it is not an illusion, it must exist, but it can only exist in an alternative reality.

Gary Gnu

www.bizsoftcorp.com

I once knew a Kenny Gilfilen, a consumate and learned AREVer wannabe. I suspect that he is the author of much of this thread. However, you will note that only part of his name is showing and some of it is missing. Since I came to work one day not long ago and found that Kenny had left. (did he really?) to work for one of the telephony companies, they said I suspect he did not leave at all, but that as he continued the thread, his theories became manifest and overtook him. He is of what he speaks and is slowly moving into the *other* place. (though I think that transformation had already occurred prior to his disappearance, er excuse me, his *shift*. Good luck, Kenny, whereever you are. We miss you here (talk about meltdown)

The bastards! They killed Kenny!

View this thread on the forum...