Sign up on the Revelation Software website to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from the Revelation community
At 18 AUG 1998 05:44:47PM Eric Allan wrote:
We are running A/Rev version 3.12 on Netware 4.11. We are also running the A/Rev NLM version 1.5. One of our automated processes looks at a comman delimited text file and incorporates this data into our application. Recently the following message was displayed on the upper left corner in A/Rev:
'Code 33 has not been been implemented
in the filing system "RTP57".
This operation will be cancelled.'
Anybody out there seen this or know what "code 33" means?
-Eric Allan
[email protected]
At 19 AUG 1998 03:52AM Andrew P McAuley wrote:
It's like an area 51 only different….
Nah, it's a SELECT.INDEX - though why it should be failing is strange…
[email protected]
Sprezzatura Ltd
World Leaders in all things RevSoft
When do you want to reboot today?[/b]
</QUOTE>
—-
=== At 19 AUG 1998 07:46PM Gary Gnu wrote: ===
<QUOTE>You wouldn't know this, being a scouser and all, but Area 51 is just a cover to keep us off the trail of Area 52, where the aliens are really held.
Studio 51 was a cover as well…after disco, they thought we'd fall for anything. All those sequins and silver..you'd almost think there were aliens there…it does explain alot though doesn't it….hmmm…maybe they were two cleaver…Wally, Eldridge and Jimmy Johnston as the Beaver..
Gary Gnu
</QUOTE>
—-
=== At 21 AUG 1998 10:01AM Ken Sewell wrote: ===
<QUOTE>Do you mean Studio 54???
</QUOTE>
—-
=== At 21 AUG 1998 01:17PM Gary Gnu wrote: ===
<QUOTE>No, I meant Studio 51. It was the largest disco in Pittsburgh.
Gary Gnu
</QUOTE>
—-
=== At 09 SEP 1998 06:36PM David Craig ABC-CLIO wrote: ===
<QUOTE>Andrew;
Do you have any more ideas on this problem? We've been having it crop up ourselves in a couple of programs, one which runs a select statment on a list of values and another which searches one of the larger files for a match on a single value. Both are searches on indexed fields but other than that there seems to be no common factor.
David C.
</QUOTE>
—-
=== At 13 SEP 1998 03:16PM Aaron Kaplan wrote: ===
<QUOTE>Maybe putting your own MFS and from there we can trace the call backwards and see exactly where it it coming from.
[email protected]
Sprezzatura, Inc.
</QUOTE>
—-
=== At 13 SEP 1998 04:23PM Andrew P Mcauley wrote: ===
<QUOTE>I'd take the indexes off, re-add and rebuild. But that's 'cos it is easier to do than think what the problem might be… it is obviously connected to indexes though so I suspect an obscure error….
[email protected]
Sprezzatura Ltd
World Leaders in all things RevSoft
</QUOTE>
View this thread on the forum...