Still having indexing woes (AREV Specific)
At 05 NOV 1997 09:29:08AM Gary M Breeding wrote:
HI again,
I'm still having trouble with file indexes beingcorrupted. Based on the messages I've mentioned in
other Topics, I have noticed that at some point
I can expect that certain links in the Btree index
do not get written back to disk, and then the next
time a user hits a pointer to the missing link, an
error message occours.
My attention has come to the fact that the hardware
comfiguration may have something to do with this
problem. Recently, certain Pentium workstations
have been introduced into the network (Novell 3.12).
One area that used to have a 486x33 is primarily
responsible for the generation of rows into those
files where the index link error are occouring.
My thinking is that one should not have a work
station that is faster than the server (a 486x66).
Is it possible that this Pentium workstation could
be causing the problem?
This AREV system (v3.0) has been up and running
without even a GFE since Jan 1994.
It has been suggested that the NLM is the curefor this problem. Could you explaine how this is
so? The published 'Facts and Features' sheet
only mentions the reduction of GRE's when using
the NLM. What about the index links? We have not
experianced any GFE problem, just missing links,
and on one occasion, we found that an entire
indexed column was reported to be missing.
Please HELP…
Thanks again,
Gary M. Breeding
At 06 NOV 1997 09:28AM Jason Snow, Tech Support wrote:
Gary,
Are the new workstations Win95? If so, you will encounter problems because of the way that OS caches and flushes transactions. In any case, using the NLM will eliminate win95 related problems, GFE's, and in most cases give a performance boost too.
Jason
At 06 NOV 1997 10:23AM Tracy Graves wrote:
Gary-
I'm not sure what effect having a slower server than
workstation would have. That could be the why of what
is happening. Are the new workstations configured
exactly the smae as the older machines (caching, file
sharing, etc?)
As far as what the NLM would do, missing/misdirected links or
columns looks to me like the definiton of data
corruption, or a GFE, which is what the NLM would
be preventing.
Tracy
At 15 JAN 1999 09:50AM Matt Fields wrote:
Jason wrote:
"In any case, using the NLM will eliminate …
GFE's"No, there's a BTRIEVE issue,
see