Arev32 I hope soon (AREV Specific)
At 06 SEP 2006 08:35:28PM Bob Laqua wrote:
Running Arev 3.12 on Novell
Had to move from win98 to win2k
Arev cpu hog.. Bought Tame for Dos
I know there is Cpu+ but if Arev32 coming..
Now Tame doesn't seem to let the suspend function work.
ie Suspend Dir /b /s Drive:/path/ ]] Test.txt
Nothing happens
So please Mike stoke the fire up on the Arev32 pot
lets get this one boiling :)
Thanks
At 07 SEP 2006 02:06PM Steve Smith wrote:
Bob,
Contact me at steve@state-of-the-art.com.au for a trial copy of CPU Plus. Also, I now have a TSR version (no change to existing AREV/Basic code) which may get you over the line very simply.
Steve
At 14 OCT 2006 12:20PM Rod B Morris wrote:
Carefull Bob, don't pay in advance for CPU+.
At 14 OCT 2006 12:44PM dsig@sigafoos.org wrote:
Rob,
not sure what you are trying to say here
either arev32 is ready and there is no time savings in CPU+ or there is a problem with CPU+ and or Steve.
Since I know Steve and have worked at clients that have CPU+ .. i can only guess that you think that arev32 is ready for shipment.
I believe that if someone is having this problem that CPU+, even now on the *eve* of Arev32, would be a good investment.
DSig
At 14 OCT 2006 01:08PM Rod B Morris wrote:
I never got a working solution from Steve. He promised to refund my money, but never has and hasn't responded to my emails for over a year. I am very dis-satisfied with Steve and disappointed that he has ignored my situation. Hence my warning of paying in advance for his product.
At 16 OCT 2006 11:38AM Ralph Johler wrote:
Rod I can see that you are upset and certainly see that it sounds like you have good reason to be upset.
What you are reporting is not however the experience we have had with Steve. I am wondering if you were trying to be in contact with him in the last year or so. Steve was very ill and was pretty much ignoring everthing and everyone in an effort to get well.
Now he is back on line and I am testing the TSR version of CPUPlus. He's been working with me on an issue we have with it. The TSR version seems even better in 'dehogging' Arev than the old version by the way.
So I would recommend you give him another chance and re-contact him.
At 16 OCT 2006 11:54AM dbakke@srpcs.com's Don Bakke wrote:
I am by no means a moderator of this board, but I would suggest that it is not appropriate to express these types of grievances in this forum without express consent from Revelation.
dbakke@srpcs.com
At 21 OCT 2006 04:05PM Rod B Morris wrote:
Don,
Where does one, then, express them that will not go unanswered?
Rod
At 23 OCT 2006 08:29AM Mike Ruane wrote:
Rod-
We prefer that items such as this be handled between the parties directly, or perhaps on a public forum, such as comp.databases.revelation, rather than on this company sponsored and moderated board.
Feel free to contact me directly at mike@revelation.com if you have any comments or questions.
Mike