Sign up on the Revelation Software website to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from the Revelation community

At 12 JUL 2001 11:16:30AM Colin Rule wrote:

Using the SORTEDCOL message, with options 4 or 5 to maintain sort fails when used with the INSERT message, in a table which is ] 64k.

Using SORTEDCOL fails on many of the inserts to insert all the data in the row.

It seems to fail only on those columns to the right of the column defined for sortation.

For example, I have 8 columns in a table.

If column 5 is the sort, then column 6,7,8 are inserted empty in many cases, when there is actually data there.

There is not a lot I can do, except to not use maintain sortation, which is a real bummer, as with ] 64k of data as I cannot use LOCATE to insert.

Colin


At 12 JUL 2001 12:55PM Don Miller - C3 Inc. wrote:

Colin ..

I'm afraid that the 64K limitation will be with us for the forseeable future. The only way I've been able to get large displays is with a data-table associated popup. Even then, it gets flaky with a lot of columns. It DOES use the INVALUE property for sorting, however.

Don Miller

C3 Inc.

View this thread on the forum...

  • third_party_content/community/commentary/forums_nonworks/761825f6818ac65985256a870053e8cc.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/12/28 07:40
  • by 127.0.0.1