Sign up on the Revelation Software website to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from the Revelation community

At 20 FEB 1998 06:58:10AM Peter Bowyer, Swiftscan Systems wrote:

Has anybody had any problems with more than one user issuing an

UPDATE_INDEX command at the same time. we have a customer where the

indexes are not being kept up to date.

Any help would be appreciated. We are using OI 3.4.


At 20 FEB 1998 08:42AM Aaron Kaplan wrote:

Is this a question or validation of a hypothesis? Do you think the running of UPDATE_INDEX is causing indexes to get set out of synch?

How is your indexing set up? Do you have a dedicated indexer or does each workstation handle updates? When you call UPDATE_INDEX is it for a specific file or for all files? Is the 'update index before filter' flag enabled? (Yes, this flag is in OI and enabled by default. From the Database Manager, Database-]Environment Settings. Click the index button.)

apk@sprezzatura.com

Sprezzatura, Inc.

www.sprezzatura.com_zz.jpg


At 20 FEB 1998 09:27AM Peter Bowyer, Swiftscan Systems wrote:

We are using UPDATE_INDEX(,,0) from an R/Basic program. Records,

particularly when deleted from a file do not appear to be updated in the index. For example, when running a program which either uses RLIST

or Btree.Extract the deleted record key is returned and therefore a subsequent read fails. Background indexing is on, update before query

is set and we are not using dedicated index server.


At 20 FEB 1998 09:50AM Aaron Kaplan wrote:

Even though I don't see why it should make a difference, try changing the UPDATE_INDEX calls to INDEX.FLUSH( , )

apk@sprezzatura.com

Sprezzatura, Inc.

www.sprezzatura.com_zz.jpg

View this thread on the forum...

  • third_party_content/community/commentary/forums_nonworks/9f46bca65c59fadb852565b10041c045.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/12/28 07:40
  • by 127.0.0.1