Join The Works program to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from Revelation staff and the Revelation community

At 18 FEB 2004 04:49:45AM [email protected] wrote:

During a talk with Tim 'The Man' Marler we wondered about the following enhancement.

Have an optional switch which would 'weigh' results based on selection criterial and return in that order.

So for example if you

SELECT TABLE WITH FIELD1=A' OR WITH FIELD2=B' OR WITH FIELD3=C'

Then you would normally get all keys with fieldS equaling equaling the values. But if the optional switch was on then it would return first those that filed1 2 and 3 had the right values, then with 2 fields then with just 1 field.

Yes, this would add time to the index retreival process but since there would be an OPTION to perform it it would be up to the developer to request.

Yes, this could be done after selection process but it would probably be much faster during 118(?) processing

[email protected]

DSigs Radio Free Oregon

Phone: 971-570-2005

OS: WinXP Pro

OI: 7.0


At 18 FEB 2004 07:07AM The Sprezzatura Group wrote:

I know what you'll say here but… you could add a dictionary item called WEIGHTED which was a GROUP type of BY WEIGHTED_COUNT where WEIGHTED_COUNT was a symbolic which added 1 per field containing data….

The Sprezzatura Group

World Leaders in all things RevSoft


At 18 FEB 2004 08:04AM [email protected] wrote:

"I know what you'll say here but… "

Don't think you do .. and since there might be women and children out here I don't think i will

[email protected]

DSigs Radio Free Oregon

Phone: 971-570-2005

OS: WinXP Pro

OI: 7.0


At 20 FEB 2004 09:47AM Oystein Reigem wrote:

Sprezzatura,

What approximately would the formula for a WEIGHTED_COUNT symbolic look like?

- Oystein -

View this thread on the Works forum...

  • third_party_content/community/commentary/forums_works/13a84a98002cae8a85256e3e0035fe5b.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/12/30 11:57
  • by 127.0.0.1