which indexing (AREV64)
At 22 MAR 2024 05:46:14PM Barry Stevens wrote:
If I am running AREV64 in OI10 and create OI10 forms etc using the same data , which indexing options should I be using and if the OI10 one, do I need to do any settings in AREV64.
At 23 MAR 2024 02:14AM Donald Bakke wrote:
If I am running AREV64 in OI10 and create OI10 forms etc using the same data , which indexing options should I be using and if the OI10 one, do I need to do any settings in AREV64.
What "indexing options" are you talking about?
At 23 MAR 2024 03:32PM Barry Stevens wrote:
If I am running AREV64 in OI10 and create OI10 forms etc using the same data , which indexing options should I be using and if the OI10 one, do I need to do any settings in AREV64.
What "indexing options" are you talking about?
Configuration Record Maintenance: CFG_RTI_UPDATE_INDEX
At 23 MAR 2024 08:03PM Donald Bakke wrote:
Configuration Record Maintenance: CFG_RTI_UPDATE_INDEX
In my opinion, I suggest holding off for a short while. This configuration record might become moot or it might have a different impact. As reported by Bryan, they are working on OI 10 to address various index related issues. One of these issues relates to the way OI 10.2.1 and AREV64 work together for indexing purposes. I believe progress is being made with this and a hotfix will be available soon enough.
At 23 MAR 2024 08:35PM Barry Stevens wrote:
Configuration Record Maintenance: CFG_RTI_UPDATE_INDEX
In my opinion, I suggest holding off for a short while. This configuration record might become moot or it might have a different impact. As reported by Bryan, they are working on OI 10 to address various index related issues. One of these issues relates to the way OI 10.2.1 and AREV64 work together for indexing purposes. I believe progress is being made with this and a hotfix will be available soon enough.
Thar was my opinion too.
I knew I had something in the back of my mind about possible issues, but was not sure of exact details or if I was dreaming.
Thanks for the heads-up!!