Join The Works program to have access to the most current content, and to be able to ask questions and get answers from Revelation staff and the Revelation community

At 23 MAR 2006 01:39:15PM Jim Vaughan wrote:

In 7.2.1 I have validation of (0.00000001,999999999) on a Edit Line; OI allows entry of zero. Is this a new bug? Or am I doing something stupid?


At 23 MAR 2006 01:57PM Warren Auyong wrote:

I just found this in v7.11 in edittable (haven't tested it in other controls):

I want to make sure text is surround with percent signs "%" e.g. %SOMETEXT%, text can be variable length

I entered the pattern "%"0Z"%"

I enter %SOMETEXT% and Form tells me: "The data must match: "%" -and- The data must contain up to 0 of any characters(s) -and- The data must match: "%"

Single quotes makes no difference.

Patterns 0Z"%" or "%"0Z work as expected. "%"5Z"%" works, but requires 5 characters to be embedded but that makes sense.

I guess I'll have to use a UDP but that carries its own set of peculiarities.

I seem to recall reporting a similar problem back in ARev 2.00


At 24 MAR 2006 01:26PM Jim Vaughan wrote:

So what's the deal with this? Is this a bug in OI? If so will it be fixed soon, or do I need to do something myself?


At 05 APR 2006 05:59PM Jim Vaughan wrote:

]] In 7.2.1 I have validation of (0.00000001,999999999) on a Edit Line; OI allows entry of zero. Is this a new bug? Or am I doing something stupid? «

Will someone please confirm that this is a bug.

If it is a bug (as opposed to something I am doing wrong) can we expect a fix anytime soon?

If no fix is going to be available what is the best work around?


At 06 APR 2006 03:38PM dbakke@srpcs.com's Don Bakke wrote:

Jim,

Obviously I'm not speaking for Revelation and I don't know whether or not to classify this as a bug but I do beleive the problem is related to precision. Check this out:

A=0.0001

B=0

C=(A=B)

C will result in 0. But if I increase the number of decimals for A like so:

A=0.00001

B=0

C=(A=B)

C will now result in 1. Your number was much smaller than this so it seems obvious to me that the validation is practicaly treating 0.00000001 as 0 in this context.

I can't think of an alternative right now other than a UDC.

dbakke@srpcs.com

SRP Computer Solutions, Inc.


At 19 APR 2006 04:50PM James Mowbray wrote:

I believe OI treats the (n,m) conversion pattern as INTEGER data mostly, so your first value is actually considered 0, so the validation passes. Try:

SUBROUTINE userconv( type, value, branch, result )

STATUS()=0

result=branch

IF type=ICONV' OR type=OCONV' THEN

  STATUS()=(value * 100000000  999999999)

END ELSE

  STATUS()=2

END

END

with 'USERCONV' as the input conversion in the form. This will verify the conversion. There will still be OI's issue of not detecting numeric changes below 4 decimal places without a precision change to contend with, but you can't have everything.


At 19 APR 2006 05:55PM James Mowbray wrote:

You'll need to add a NUM check if you're not sure the user will enter numeric data.

View this thread on the Works forum...

  • third_party_content/community/commentary/forums_works/de97bcec06ef2a0e8525713a0060fa63.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/12/30 11:57
  • by 127.0.0.1